2005 Quarter 4 Edition
Issue Number 3


Anholt NBI Q4 Ranking

Country

Q4

United Kingdom 1
Switzerland 2
Canada 3
Italy 4
Sweden 5
Germany 6
Japan 7
France 8
Australia 9
United States 10
Spain 11
Holland 12
Norway 13
Denmark 14
New Zealand 15
Belgium 16
Ireland 17
Portugal 18
China 19
Russia 20
Hungary 21
Brazil 22
Singapore 23
Argentina 24
South Korea 25
India 26
Mexico 27
Egypt 28
Czech Republic 29
Poland 30
Malaysia 31
South Africa 32
Estonia 33
Indonesia 34
Turkey 35
  

Podcast

Listen to expert Simon Anholt as he presents the findings from the latest Nation Brands Index.

What The Media is Saying

"If the British consultant Simon Anholt had his way, sitting at the cabinet table with the secretary of defense and the attorney general would be a secretary of branding.

Indeed, he foresees a day when the most important part of foreign policy isn't defense or trade but image - and when countries would protect and promote their images through coordinated branding departments."

- NY Times
Click here to
request full article

Branding Places Q4 2005 Newsletter

GDP: $12.37 trillion...
Labor Force: 149.3 million employed...
Nation Brand Value: Priceless.

For the first time, with the help of Brand Finance (www.brandfinance.com), we have added a new and very exciting dimension to the Anholt Nation Brands Index: a financial valuation of 32 of the brands in the list. It is now possible for us to put a dollar value on the reputations of the countries in the NBI, giving a sense of the real contribution of the brand to the nation's economy.

Country

Brand Value (US$ BN)

Brand Value/ GDP 2004

BV per head of population (US$)

Brand Rating

USA
17,893
152%
60,963
AA-
Japan
6,205
133%
48,566
A
Germany
4,582
167%
55,449
BBB+
UK
3,475
163%
58,492
BBB+
France
2,922
143%
48,714
BBB+
Italy
2,811
167%
48,821
BBB+
Spain
1,758
169%
38,566
BBB+
Canada
1,106
111%
34,669
BBB
Australia
821
133%
40,785
BBB
Netherlands
792
137%
48,762
BBB
Denmark
772
320%
143,055
BBB
China
712
43%
549
BBB-
Russia
663
113%
4,641
BBB-
Switzerland
558
156%
75,621
BBB-
Belgium
456
130%
43,864
BB+
Sweden
398
115%
44,309
BB+
Ireland
300
165%
74,658
BB+
India
291
46%
270
BB
Mexico
281
41%
2,704
BB-
Norway
276
110%
60,151
BB-
South Korea
240
26%
4,986
BB-
Turkey
189
63%
2,635
B+
Portugal
189
112%
18,067
B
Brazil
181
30%
1,013
B
Singapore
106
100%
24,761
B
New Zealand
102
106%
25,132
B
South Africa
94
44%
2,282
B
Hungary
78
77%
7,699
B
Egypt
67
21%
976
B
Czech Republic
55
51%
5,379
B
Argentina
55
36%
1,432
B-
Poland
43
18%
1,138
CCC

To perform the valuation of each country brand, Brand Finance used the 'royalty relief' approach. This approach assumes a country does not own its own brand and calculates how much it would need to pay to license it from a third party. The present value of that stream of (hypothetical) brand contribution payments represents the value of the brand.

To learn more about this methodology, please click here to
download the full report

Simon Anholt: Saving Brand Turkey

TurkeyA nation's brand image is its most valuable asset. It is national identity made robust, tangible, communicable, and - at its best - made useful.

Turkey urgently needs to harness and take control of its own brand image, and put it to work in the highly competitive marketplace of today's globalized world. Looking at Turkey's scores in my survey makes one realize how serious a barrier to progress a poor image can be, obscuring and even obstructing the real progress being made in some areas. Turkey has a long way to go before it can really prosper in the global 'marketplace' for tourists, investors, consumers, talent and for the respect and attention of the world's media and other governments. Taking a brand-oriented perspective on the reforms and investments which are needed ensures that progress is efficient, focused, and strategically driven for quicker and longer lasting results.

The brand images of countries, whether good or bad, are seldom an entirely accurate reflection of the reality of the country. In the case of developing countries, the most common reason for this disconnect between image and reality is time. The country may change quite quickly, but its image lags behind by years or decades and sometimes even centuries. Turkey, along with many developing economies, suffers from an image which was forged during an earlier and very different political era, and which now constantly obstructs its political, economic, cultural and social aspirations. In many ways, Turkey's brand image today in the West is in the same shape as if Atatürk had never lived.

Turkey & NBITurkey is the only EU accession state in the Anholt Nation Brands Index, and its weak international brand image is likely to play a more fundamental role in questions of international relations and regional integration than many people imagine. Turkey’s low brand score is depressingly consistent, averaging between 24th and 25th place in all of the regions where the NBI is run (although it must be stressed that until 2006, no predominantly Muslim countries were included in the panel). It is a concern that despite Turkey now having started EU accession talks, ordinary consumers in several of its future European partner states – Spain, France, Germany, Denmark and Italy – put it bottom overall, and no European panel scores it higher than 20 on any point of the hexagon. Generally Turkey’s best figures are for tourism (it even manages a 19th place in tourism from the Polish panel), but it's safe to say that Brand Turkey has virtually no equity.

Except, that is, in Japan, where it ranks surprisingly high overall, at 16th place, and South Korea, where the Turkish people are given an unusually high tenth place and the country an overall 17th. This, at least, points to an area of opportunity.

Nation branding is partly about understanding how the grain of public opinion lies, because working with the grain is so much easier and faster than working across or against it. So this data is surely an indication that commercial, cultural, social and political relations between Turkey and East Asia (although which East Asian countries, apart from Japan and South Korea, remains to be seen) might prove to be the path of least resistance towards building prosperity and an enhanced international reputation.

Click here to request the full article

5,000,000 Consumers, 200 Nations, 1 Solution: GMI Global Panels

GMI Survey PanelsThe world's leading suppliers of survey sample, GMI (Global Market Insite, Inc.) offers clients a high-integrity, single-vendor solution for business and consumer panels in 200 countries. This panel powers the Anholt Nation Brands Index, Anholt City Brands Index and place branding projects for many national governments. More than five million highly profiled panelists now participate in our panels. Excellence at every point of interaction with respondents ensures that they are satisfied, engaged, and generating meaningful data.

To learn more about our panels, please click here.

 


Behind The Scenes: Employee Spotlight of the Month

Rakina Kaneva, Director of Data Processing Services

Rakina KanevaRakina joined GMI in April 2001, bringing 7 years of marketing research experience to the company. Her background is broad-based in custom research techniques and market research consulting. She brings extensive knowledge and expertise to GMI in terms of research design, data processing, weighting, and quality management.

Rakina is responsible for overseeing all aspects of the development, design and deployment of the GMI Omnibus, Anholt Nation Brands Index, and Stewart-Allen BrandBarometer™, as well as providing technical direction to the new DP-related product development initiatives in North America, Europe and Asia-Pacific.

Rakina, on the Anholt Nation Brands Index: "I am always excited to see the latest results of the Anholt Nation Brands Index because worldly events are always reflected in the data."